Skip to main content

Main menu

  • About the Journal
    • Aims & Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Browse Archive
    • Abstracting - Indexing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Online Submission
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Sample Issue
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
    • How to Subscribe
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

User menu

  • Log-in
  • Sign-up for alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Water Science & Technology
  • Other Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

Log-in

Sign-up for alerts   

  • My Cart
Water Science & Technology
Browse Archive
Advanced Search
  • About the Journal
    • Aims & Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Browse Archive
    • Abstracting - Indexing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Online Submission
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Sample Issue
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
    • How to Subscribe
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 32, Issue 7

TSS/BOD removal efficiency and cost comparison of chemical and biological wastewater treatment

Valentin Nenov
Published October 1995, 32 (7) 207-214;
Valentin Nenov
Department of Water Treatment Technologies, Bourgas University of Technology, Bourgas 8010, Bulgaria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Based on standard settling column tests, Jar tests and continuous activated sludge laboratory experiments as well as combination of these processes implemented for a treatment of municipal wastewater with a composition typical for the influent water of Ravda Municipal Wastewater Treatment (MWWT) plant, the removal efficiency obtained in respect of the total suspended solids (TSS) and the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) was evaluated.

The laboratory experiments confirmed the high efficiency of the chemically enhanced mechanical treatment (CEMT) towards TSS and BOD/COD removal. The data obtained show that low dose chemical treatment in a large range of surface flow rate of precipitation provides a reduction of TSS and BOD/COD larger than 60% and 50%, respectively.

Regarding Ravda WWTP as a typical case for the Black Sea coast it was proved that CEMT is an attractive alternative for retrofitting the existing plants based on the activated sludge process as a secondary treatment process. CEMT upgrading can be done at much lower cost (practically only O&M treatment expenditure is required) compared with an eventual biological step extension.

  • Coastal pollution
  • physical & chemical treatment
  • urban water
  • wastewater
  • © IWA Publishing 1995

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

User Login Menu

  • Create a new account
  • Forgot username/password?
  • Can't get past this page?
  • Help with Cookies
  • Need to Activate?
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top

SELECTED ISSUE

Water Science and Technology: 77 (7)
  Volume 32, Issue 7

  Table of Contents
  Uncorrected Proofs
  Browse Archive

Actions

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Water Science & Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TSS/BOD removal efficiency and cost comparison of chemical and biological wastewater treatment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Water Science & Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Water Science & Technology web site.
Share
TSS/BOD removal efficiency and cost comparison of chemical and biological wastewater treatment
Valentin Nenov
Water Science and Technology Oct 1995, 32 (7) 207-214;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
TSS/BOD removal efficiency and cost comparison of chemical and biological wastewater treatment
Valentin Nenov
Water Science and Technology Oct 1995, 32 (7) 207-214;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
View Full PDF
Save to my folders
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • An inexact multi-objective programming model for water resources management in industrial parks of Binhai New Area, China
  • Use of the ferrates (FeIV–VI) in combination with hydrogen peroxide for rapid and effective remediation of water – laboratory and pilot study
  • Adsorption of sunset yellow FCF from aqueous solution by chitosan-modified diatomite
Show more Research Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

coastal pollution
physical & chemical treatment
urban water
wastewater
  • Current Issue
  • Uncorrected Proofs
  • Browse Archive
  • Feedback
  • Online Submission
  • Subscribe
  • Contents Alerts
  • About the Journal
  • Open Access
  • Rights & Permissions

IWA Publishing
Alliance House
12, Caxton Street
London SW1H 0QS, UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7654 5500
Fax: +44 (0)20 7654 5555
Remove (0) if calling from outside the UK
iwapublishing.com
Company registered in England no. 3690822

© IWA Publishing | Cookies | Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Site Map | ISSN Print: 0273-1223 | ISSN Online: 1996-9732