Skip to main content

Main menu

  • About the Journal
    • Aims & Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Browse Archive
    • Abstracting - Indexing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Online Submission
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Sample Issue
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
    • How to Subscribe
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

User menu

  • Log-in
  • Sign-up for alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Water Science & Technology
  • Other Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

Log-in

Sign-up for alerts   

  • My Cart
Water Science & Technology
Browse Archive
Advanced Search
  • About the Journal
    • Aims & Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Browse Archive
    • Abstracting - Indexing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Online Submission
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Sample Issue
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
    • How to Subscribe
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 54, Issue 6-7

Comparison between two methodologies for urban drainage decision aid

P.M. Moura, M.B. Baptista, S. Barraud
Published September 2006, 54 (6-7) 493-499; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.612
P.M. Moura
Departamento de Engenharia Hidráulica e Recursos Hídricos, Escola de Engenharia da UFMG, Av. Contorno, 842, 80 Andar, 30110.060, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil (E-mail: pmmoura@terra.com.br)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.B. Baptista
Departamento de Engenharia Hidráulica e Recursos Hídricos, Escola de Engenharia da UFMG, Av. Contorno, 842, 80 Andar, 30110.060, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil (E-mail: pmmoura@terra.com.br)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Barraud
URGC Hydrologie Urbaine, INSA Lyon, Bâtiment J.C.A. Coulomb, 34 avenue des Arts, 69621 Villeurbanne, Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The objective of the present work is to compare two methodologies based on multicriteria analysis for the evaluation of stormwater systems. The first methodology was developed in Brazil and is based on performance-cost analysis, the second one is ELECTRE III. Both methodologies were applied to a case study. Sensitivity and robustness analyses were then carried out. These analyses demonstrate that both methodologies have equivalent results, and present low sensitivity and high robustness. These results prove that the Brazilian methodology is consistent and can be used safely in order to select a good solution or a small set of good solutions that could be compared with more detailed methods afterwards.

  • Cost
  • multicriteria analysis
  • performance indicators
  • urban drainage
  • © IWA Publishing 2006

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

User Login Menu

  • Create a new account
  • Forgot username/password?
  • Can't get past this page?
  • Help with Cookies
  • Need to Activate?
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top

SELECTED ISSUE

Water Science and Technology: 77 (6)
  Volume 54, Issue 6-7

  Table of Contents
  Uncorrected Proofs
  Browse Archive

Actions

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Water Science & Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison between two methodologies for urban drainage decision aid
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Water Science & Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Water Science & Technology web site.
Share
Comparison between two methodologies for urban drainage decision aid
P.M. Moura, M.B. Baptista, S. Barraud
Water Science and Technology Sep 2006, 54 (6-7) 493-499; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.612
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison between two methodologies for urban drainage decision aid
P.M. Moura, M.B. Baptista, S. Barraud
Water Science and Technology Sep 2006, 54 (6-7) 493-499; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.612

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
View Full PDF
Save to my folders
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • An inexact multi-objective programming model for water resources management in industrial parks of Binhai New Area, China
  • Use of the ferrates (FeIV–VI) in combination with hydrogen peroxide for rapid and effective remediation of water – laboratory and pilot study
  • Adsorption of sunset yellow FCF from aqueous solution by chitosan-modified diatomite
Show more Research Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

cost
multicriteria analysis
performance indicators
urban drainage
  • Current Issue
  • Uncorrected Proofs
  • Browse Archive
  • Feedback
  • Online Submission
  • Subscribe
  • Contents Alerts
  • About the Journal
  • Open Access
  • Rights & Permissions

IWA Publishing
Alliance House
12, Caxton Street
London SW1H 0QS, UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7654 5500
Fax: +44 (0)20 7654 5555
Remove (0) if calling from outside the UK
iwapublishing.com
Company registered in England no. 3690822

© IWA Publishing | Cookies | Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Site Map | ISSN Print: 0273-1223 | ISSN Online: 1996-9732