Skip to main content

Main menu

  • About the Journal
    • Aims & Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Browse Archive
    • Abstracting - Indexing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Online Submission
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Sample Issue
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
    • How to Subscribe
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

User menu

  • Log-in
  • Sign-up for alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Water Science & Technology
  • Other Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

Log-in

Sign-up for alerts   

  • My Cart
Water Science & Technology
Browse Archive
Advanced Search
  • About the Journal
    • Aims & Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Browse Archive
    • Abstracting - Indexing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Online Submission
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Sample Issue
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
    • How to Subscribe
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 76, Issue 12

Research on a soft measurement model of sewage treatment based on a case-based reasoning approach

Jiayan Zhang, Cuicui Du, Xugang Feng
Published December 2017, 76 (12) 3181-3189; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.417
Jiayan Zhang
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui 243002, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cuicui Du
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui 243002, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xugang Feng
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui 243002, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fxg773@ahut.edu.cn
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Data
Loading

Abstract

In this paper, the measurement of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in a wastewater treatment process is analyzed and an intelligent integrated prediction method based on case-based reasoning (CBR) is proposed in order to overcome difficulties. Due to the fact that there are many factors that influence the accuracy of the prediction model, the radial basis function, which is a neural network with a 3 layer feedforward network, is employed to reduce the dimension of input values. Under these circumstances, a back propagation neural network combining with a nearest neighbor retrieval strategy is adopted to match case. Then, the measurement of BOD in wastewater treatment process is analyzed. Finally, the validity of the improved CBR in sewage treatment is demonstrated by using numerical results.

  • case-based reasoning (CBR)
  • intelligent integrated prediction
  • sewage treatment
  • soft-sensing

INTRODUCTION

Wastewater and sewage threatens human safety and development, as well as impeding the sustainable development of the economy and society (Zhang et al. 2016). In order to curb the adverse effects of environmental pollution due to the uncontrolled discharge of sewage, effective measurements must be taken to ensure that the discharge of sewage meets the required standards (Izady et al. 2016).

Activated sludge is the most widely adopted method in wastewater treatment processes, which utilizes the organic compounds in wastewater as the culture medium (Mjalli et al. 2007). To achieve the purpose of removing organic substances, the microbial populations are co-cultured under the condition of oxygen, and the operation is finished by adsorption, condensation, oxidation, decomposition and precipitation.

There are several quality indexes of sewage treatment such as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN)-containing, total phosphorus (TP)-containing, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) (Liu & Zhang 2015). However, the examination of these parameters of sewage treatment mainly depends on artificial sampling to test and analyze. It has large errors and fails to control automatically in real time. Take for example the examination of BOD. The steps for the examination of BOD are as follows. Use a water sample to fill a totally enclosed bottle with dissolved oxygen (DO). The BOD is assessed by iodometric method. Especially, the testing cycle of BOD is longer relatively (Ren et al. 2014), which enormously lags in the process of sewage disposal. Therefore, when a nonconforming outlet water quality of BOD is detected, a large amount of water with exceeding hygienic standard has already been emitted. Soft sensors can be used to estimate variables that can not be measured in real time. Based on the optimal rule, a set of indirect variables is determined which not only have a significant association with the variables under test, but can also be measured easily. Mathematical models to be measured are established to realize the measurement for the variable under test (Ben et al. 2017). Therefore, in order to realize real-time monitoring and forecasting of a sewage treatment process, a soft-sensing method is applied to measure quality index parameters, construct a model of measuring the parameters such as BOD, develop the system for on-line monitoring and predict the quality index parameters in the sewage disposal process. It can not only control the quality of effluent, but also has great theoretical significance and engineering application value (Tang & Guan 2017).

Soft-sensing techniques in wastewater treatment processes have been widely researched and exploited by many groups. Liu et al. (2017) proposed a soft-sensing model of a water quality parameter under multiple loading conditions based on multiple models, which aims at the analysis of characteristic parameters of water quality in wastewater treatment processes. What's more, inspired by the idea of multi-model modeling of soft handoff, Qiao et al. (2016) proposed a new soft-sensing method of controlling effluent quality. They used the recursive least square algorithm to learn a linear auto regressive exogenous (ARX) model. By analyzing the coupling relationship among the key effluent quality parameters (COD, BOD, TN, TP), Yoo et al. (2016) presented a soft-sensing model based on feedforward neural networks. In this model, a soft-sensing approach based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm is adopted (Struijs et al. 2016), and the performance of the algorithm is demonstrated by using simulation results. Aiming at the characteristics of strong-nonlinearity and coupling in wastewater treatment process, Dąbrowski et al. (2017) proposed the soft-sensing approach of multi-model modeling based on fuzzy kernel clustering. According to different wear conditions, the input parameters are used to get cluster partition using a fuzzy kernel clustering algorithm. Furthermore, sub-models were built for every subset of clusters based on least squares support vector machines (Yang et al. 2016). Finally, the system output is obtained by using the sub-models switching strategy. However, due to the characteristics of bad production circumstances, drastic working condition changes, strong coupling and large delay in wastewater treatment process (Kumar et al. 2016), these soft sensor modeling methods have a poor global generalization ability and low estimation precision. Therefore, in this paper, a case-based reasoning (CBR) method on a soft sensor model of wastewater treatment process control parameters is proposed by combining a radial basis function (RBF) neural network and CBR. Experimental results show that the measuring accuracy of the approach is high.

FACTOR ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURE DESIGN AFFECTING THE FORECASTING MODEL

There are five main factors that influence the BOD parameters in wastewater treatment process, namely: water, carbon and inorganic salts, growth factors and energy (De Soto et al. 2016). By analyzing the technological mechanism of biological wastewater treatment, the concrete parameters influencing BOD have been basically defined, including mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), temperature, pH value, effluent COD/DO, electric currents of n pump motors, NH4+-N and hydraulic retention time (HRT). If these parameters were used as the input variable of the forecasting model, it would cause excessive input variables and reduce the forecasting effect of the model (Lee & Oh 2016). Therefore, in this paper, we put the electric currents of pump motors as the input variable of the RBF neural network and calculate the total water inflow Q. Then the aforesaid variable parameters and Q are used as the input variable to calculate the BOD through the improved CBR approach. The structure of the intelligent integration of the forecasting model for BOD is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Forecasting model of BOD.

CONSTRUCTION OF THE FORECASTING MODEL OF THE TOTAL WATER INFLOW BASED ON RBF

A RBF neural network is a local approximation neural network. In theory, it can approximate any continuous function if there are enough neurons. It not only has a fast learning rate, but it can also avoid local minimums (De Sousa et al. 2016). Thus, it can satisfy the requirement of real-time control. In this paper, 250 groups of data samples in a wastewater treatment process are selected to carry on modeling and the selected data samples are processed abnormally. The first 150 groups are used as the training samples of the model, and then the remaining 100 groups are used to test the forecasting effect of the model. After normalization processing for the original data, a three-layer RBF neural network is used to carry on modeling. The basic principle is to set RBF as the ‘base’ of the hidden units to construct the hidden layer. It can avoid using the weights to connect between the input layer and the hidden layer.

When the center point of the RBF is determined, the structure of the net can be confirmed. The electric currents of pump motors are selected as the input variable of the model and the output variable is the total water inflow Q. In addition, the hidden layer nodes are confirmed by the orthogonal least square. In this paper, the hidden layer nodes are 17 and the Gauss function is used as the function of hidden layer nodes. The output of the i hidden layer node can be expressed by an equation (Barber 2016) Embedded Image 1where,

  • Embedded Imageis the input vector, Embedded Image is the number of hidden nodes

  • Embedded Image is the output of the Embedded Image hidden layer node

  • Embedded Image is the width of the center point for the action function

  • Embedded Image is the data center of the Embedded Image node in the hidden layer

Embedded Image is the Euclidean distance between input vector Embedded Image and the data center Embedded Image.

The forecasting model of the total water inflow Q is denoted by Embedded Image 2where,

  • Embedded Image is the output value of the net

  • Embedded Image is the value of the connection between the hidden layer node Embedded Image and the output node Embedded Image

  • Embedded Image is the output of the Embedded Image hidden layer node.

There are three parameters to be dealt with in RBF neural network, namely Embedded Image, Embedded Image and Embedded Image. Because the mapping between the hidden layer and output layer is linear, so Embedded Image is obtained by using the least square method. Denote Embedded Image 3where,

  • Embedded Image means the number of the selected data center

  • Embedded Image means maximum center distance between the Embedded Image data and other data.

DESIGN OF FORECASTING MODEL FOR BOD BASED ON CBR

CBR has been widely applied in various fields (Singh et al. 2016). It is one kind of reasoning method based on specific knowledge according to past experience. Compared with conventional expert systems, it has some advantages. In the present problem, CBR will find some similar problems which have been solved in past memory by comparing attribute characteristics. Then it makes some adjustment and modification accordingly so as to assist in solving the problem.

CBR is used to carry out soft-sensor modeling, and it can realize simple tasks and easily train the new neural network (Xu et al. 2016). In CBR, one or more related cases are retrieved in the case base so as to solve a new problem and then use the solution which is obtained through case matching to verify the application effect. If the degree of matching of the solution is high, the solution is adopted. Otherwise, it will go on adjusting to get a preserved and matching case. At present, there is no one universal CBR which is suitable for all fields. The main reason is that different fields and problems generally require different methods, and it can reflect the validity of the system through case representation, case matching, case adaption, case learning and maintenance. The main flowchart of the forecasting model based on CBR is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Prediction model of CBR.

Case representation

Since the case includes a description of the problem and its solution, the representation of the case should contain at least 2 aspects. So it can be expressed as one ordered pair <problem, solution>. In addition, the generation time of the case is added in the forecasting model of the BOD. Therefore, the case of the forecasting model for the qualitative index of the sewage is composed of time, case description and the solution. Case description is the selected auxiliary variable, and the solution is the predictive value of the BOD. The operating mode features include MLSS (activated sludge concentration), temperature, pH value, effluent COD/DO, Water inflow Q, NH4+-N and HRT, which are selected as auxiliary variables. It can be represented as Embedded Image, and the solution is expressed as Embedded Image. The storage mechanism for individuating information is shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Storage mechanism for individuating information

Case matching based on back propagation neural network

Case matching

Case matching is the key technique in a CBR system. In order to find out as few as possible revisable cases which are similar to the description of the problem quickly and accurately, a powerful indexing and case base are needed to control the direction of search. Among these, the nearest-neighbor strategy is the simplest, most convenient and the most widely adopted method. Based on the geometric model method of ‘distance’, this paper carries out a measurement of the similarity. According to the definition of Euclidean distance, the similarity function can be denoted by Embedded Image 4where,

  • Embedded Image represent the current working condition vector and the case description of the case Embedded Image

  • Embedded Image is the weighted coefficient of the descriptive characteristics of the working condition.

Case matching based on back propagation

There are various factors which have coupling and complicated nonlinearity in the soft sensors model of wastewater treatment process control parameters. The nearest neighbor algorithm can be used to solve sample problems and determine the weight of the attribute easily. For complex problems like soft sensors in a wastewater treatment process, it is difficult to determine the weight of each attribute reasonably owing to the complicated relationships among attributes. So, the nearest neighbor algorithm will lose its meaning. Therefore, the technology of back propagation (BP) neural networks is applied to case matching. Train the previous input/output samples until convergence, and then save the data of the link weight in order to be called by case matching. Finally, the data are compared with samples in the base case, so as to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the case matching.

The implementation step for a BP neural network

Step 1: The initialization of the BP neural network. According to the randomized principle, the connection weight Embedded Image between the input layer and hidden layer, the connection weight Embedded Image, the threshold Embedded Image,Embedded Image between the hidden layer and output layer will be given by a random value in the interval (−1, 1). Because the nonlinear self-response term is sensitive to the initial conditions, each initial state corresponds to one motion trajectory.

Step 2: Provide one input-output model Embedded Image randomly.

Step 3: Determine the input and output value between the hidden layer and output layer. We denote Embedded Image 5 Embedded Image 6 Embedded Image 7 Embedded Image 8where, Embedded Image Embedded Image Step 4: Construct the random movement mechanism of the connection weight parameter value. Equations (9) and (10) are the calibration error of the connection weight of the input and output layer respectively. Adjust the connection weight between the hidden and output layer. Firstly, generate the random Embedded Image value among the interval (0, 1).

Embedded Image means a probability, which is brought by nonlinear self-feedback.

When Embedded Image make the adjustment according to Equation (11).

When Embedded Image make the adjustment according to Equation (12).

Where, t is the time of learning.

Furthermore, adjust the threshold of the neural unit of the output layer according to Equation (13). In the same way, adjust the connection weight Embedded Image between the input and hidden layer according to Equations (14), (15) and (16). Denote Embedded Image 9 Embedded Image 10 Embedded Image 11 Embedded Image 12 Embedded Image 13 Embedded Image 14 Embedded Image 15 Embedded Image 16

Case adaption

Because the process of case retrieval is to look for the most similar case in the case base, it is difficult to identify past cases which well match the current problem. So the past cases need to be adjusted appropriately. The adaption of the cases includes the selection of the content, the transformation and evaluation of the solution. If an adjusted case passes the quality estimation of the case evaluation, it will be put into practice. Meanwhile, it will be deposited in the case base after the evaluation of the learning technology. In order to eliminate the inconsistency of time and prevent the time of the case failing, old cases need to be deleted.

The required adjusted cases are assumed to be Embedded Image cases, respectively Embedded Image and the estimated value of the current condition information is denoted by Embedded Image 17where,

Embedded Image is the similarity between the current condition information and the cases in the case base, which is calculated according to Equation (4), above.

After the adjustment of the case, the system exports the results and records the time, case description and case solution.

Case learning and maintenance

The process of case learning is to make the adjusted cases deposit in the case base. If there are existing cases which are the same as the target case in the case base, the target case will be abandoned directly. Otherwise, the adjusted cases will be saved in the case base. Case learning is an incremental learning method, and a system with high academic ability can alleviate the problem of retrieval time and the increased number of cases effectively. An increase in numbers in the case base can improve the accuracy of the system, but slow down the operating speed of the system. Therefore, prompt case maintenance is an important step for case reasoning. In order to make the cases have high typicality, timeliness, consistency and non-redundancy, case maintenance generally uses methods to keep the features, such as fluctuating the number of the case samples, pruning interferential case samples and adjusting the structure of the case base and the index device and so on.

MODEL TRAINING AND VALIDATION BASED ON ACTUAL OPERATIONAL DATA

In order to verify the reliability of the forecasting model, the MLSS (activated sludge concentration), temperature, pH value, effluent COD/DO, Water inflow Q, NH4+-N and HRT, which are selected as the auxiliary variables, are collected in wastewater treatment plants. The corresponding detection values of the BOD parameter are collected as the primary variable. In case of abnormal samples or date, normalization processing is used to ensure that the indexes are located on the same number order and to obtain 250 groups sample points. The first 150 groups are used to make the initial modeling, and then the remaining 100 groups are used to test the forecasting effect of the model. The simulation diagrams are as follows.

  • (1) The prediction effect of the soft-sensing model of the sewage treatment based on a RBF neural network is shown in Figure 3.

  • (2) The prediction effect of the soft-sensing model of the sewage treatment based on conventional CBR is shown in Figure 4.

  • (3) The prediction effect of the soft-sensing model of the sewage treatment based on improved CBR is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Soft sensor model predictions curve of sewage treatment. Experimental conditions: MATLAB simulation tool, DO concentration: approximately 2.6 mg/L, COD: 30–120 mg/L (average value), NH4+-N: 25–60 mg/L (average value), pH: 6–9.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Soft sensor model predictions curve of sewage treatment based on conventional CBR. Experimental conditions: MATLAB simulation tool, DO concentration: approximately 2.6 mg/L, COD: 30–120 mg/L (average value), NH4+-N: 25–60 mg/L (average value), pH: 6–9.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Soft sensor model predictions curve of sewage treatment based on improved CBR. Experimental conditions: MATLAB simulation tool, DO concentration: approximately 2.6 mg/L, COD: 30–120 mg/L (average value), NH4+-N: 25–60 mg/L (average value), pH: 6–9.

In order to evaluate the model, the following three performance indexes are used to evaluating the forecasting results. The smaller the error, the better the forecasting results. These performance indexes are given by:

  • (1) Root mean-square error Embedded Image 18

  • (2) Mean-absolute relative error Embedded Image 19

  • (3) Maximize-absolute relative error Embedded Image 20

where,

  • Embedded Image is the number of the testing sample

  • Embedded Image is the actual value of the data

  • Embedded Image is the forecasting value of the model.

The prediction performance is shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Evaluating indicators

As can be seen in Figures 3, 4 and 5, the training results of the model are close to the actual results. Furthermore, a comparison of the performances of the forecasting model is given in Table 2. Results show that the control precision of the soft-sensing model based on improved CBR is greatly improved. Thus it can be seen that the soft-sensing model of sewage treatment based on CBR approach can effectively solve the real-time estimation problem of performance indexes in wastewater treatment processing.

ENGINEERING APPLICATION

In order to validate the application effect of the proposed predictive model in an industrial field, the MLSS (activated sludge concentration), temperature, pH value, effluent COD/DO, Water inflow Q, NH4+-N and HRT, which were selected as the auxiliary variables, are collected in wastewater treatment plants. The corresponding detection values of the BOD parameter are collected as the primary variable. The selected 150 groups are used to make the initial modeling, and then the established model is carried out for the measurement of the BOD. The following parts show the simulation diagrams to compare results of the three results with the actual value.

It can be seen from Figure 6 that the predictive value of the soft-sensing model based on RBF shows more stability, but it gets low accuracy. Furthermore, compared with other estimations, there is a relatively huge difference between the predicted and actual values from May to June. This result indicates that the soft-sensing model based on RBF is influenced by the time for training sample. As shown in Figures 7 and 8, the forecasting value of the soft-sensing model based on CBR becomes more and more close to the actual value over time. This is because the CBR improves the rules of the case base until it achieves the best effect. Comparing the three prediction results, it can be seen that the forecasting result of the soft-sensing model based on the conventional CBR is similar to the RBF. However, the forecasting result of the improved soft-sensing model based on CBR is the closest to the actual value. It also indicates the validity of the improved soft-sensing model based on CBR in the prediction of wastewater BOD. Han et al. (2016) proposed a soft-sensing approach of sewage treatment based on a RBF neural network. However, the proposed method has shortcomings such as slow speed of convergence, poor capability of fitting, low accuracy of prediction and indefiniteness of the training results. An et al. (2016) adopted the soft measurement of a BP neural network to establish the prediction model of dissolved oxygen concentration. The simulation results show that, using a genetic algorithm to optimize a BP neural network weight and threshold value together with normalized training data effectively solve the dissolved oxygen concentration accuracy in a BP soft measurement model. However, the measurement accuracy of the dissolved oxygen in the soft measurement model is lower than the proposed CBR approach in this paper.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6

Comparison of actual value and soft sensor model predictions value of sewage treatment based on RBF neural network. Experimental conditions: MATLAB simulation tool, DO concentration: approximately 2.6 mg/L, COD: 30–120 mg/L (average value), NH4+-N: 25–60 mg/L (average value), pH: 6–9.

Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7

Comparison of actual value and soft sensor model prediction value of sewage treatment based on conventional CBR. Experimental conditions: MATLAB simulation tool, DO concentration: approximately 2.6 mg/L, COD: 30–120 mg/L (average value), NH4+-N: 25–60 mg/L (average value), pH: 6–9.

Figure 8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8

Comparison of actual value and soft sensor model predictions value of sewage treatment based on improved CBR. Experimental conditions: MATLAB simulation tool, DO concentration: approximately 2.6 mg/L, COD: 30–120 mg/L (average value), NH4+-N: 25–60 mg/L (average value), pH: 6–9.

CONCLUSION

This paper proposed a predictive method by applying intelligent integrated modeling which is integrated by the RBF neural network and improved CBR. Comparing the single forecasting methods based on RBF, the intelligent integrated modeling method presented in this paper can enhance the prediction accuracy and robustness of the model. This method can effectively solve the forecast problems of BOD in wastewater treatment process and also has some engineering significance and practical value.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We greatly appreciate the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Higher Education Institutions of China [grant number: KJ2013A054].

  • First received 15 March 2017.
  • Accepted in revised form 27 June 2017.
  • © 2017 The Authors

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. An A. M.,
    2. Qi L. C.,
    3. Chou Y. X.,
    4. Zhang H. S.,
    5. Song H. B.
    2016 The study on soft sensor with BP neural network and its application to dissolved oxygen concentration. Computers and Applied Chemistry 33 (01), 117–121.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Barber W. P. F.
    2016 Thermal hydrolysis for sewage treatment: a critical review. Water Research 104, 53–71.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Ben W. W.,
    2. Wang J.,
    3. Cao R. K.,
    4. Yang M.,
    5. Zhang Y.,
    6. Qiang Z. M.
    2017 Distribution of antibiotic resistance in the effluents of ten municipal wastewater treatment plants in China and the effect of treatment processes. Chemosphere 172, 392–398.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Dąbrowski W.,
    2. Żyłka R.,
    3. Malinowski P.
    2017 Evaluation of energy consumption during aerobic sewage sludge treatment in dairy wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Research 153, 135–139.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. De Soto B. G.,
    2. Adey B. T.
    2016 Preliminary resource-based estimates combining artificial intelligence approaches and traditional techniques. Procedia Engineering 164, 261–268.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. De Sousa R. V.,
    2. Canata T. F.,
    3. Leme P. R.,
    4. Martello L. S.
    2016 Development and evaluation of a fuzzy logic classifier for assessing beef cattle thermal stress using weather and physiological variables. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 127, 176–183.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Han H. G.,
    2. Zhang S.,
    3. Qiao J. F.
    2016 Soft-sensing measurement of permeability of MBR membrane based on recurrent RBF neural network. 2016 Chinese Conference on Process Control 107.
  8. ↵
    1. Izady A.,
    2. Abdalla O.,
    3. Sadeghi M.,
    4. Majidi M.,
    5. Karimi A.,
    6. Chen M.
    2016 A novel approach to modeling wastewater evaporation based on dimensional analysis. Water Resources Management 8 (30), 2801–2814.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Kumar J.,
    2. Singh A.,
    3. Panda M. K.,
    4. Bhadauria H. S.
    2016 Study and performance analysis of routing protocol based on CBR. Procedia Computer Science 85, 23–30.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Lee J. H.,
    2. Oh J. E.
    2016 A comprehensive survey on the occurrence and fate of nitrosamines in sewage treatment plants and water environment. Science of the Total Environment 556, 330–337.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Liu S. J.,
    2. Zhang S. Y.
    2015 Design of automatic door monitoring system based-on the MCGS. Machinery & Electronics (3), 63–66.
  12. ↵
    1. Liu P.,
    2. Gernjak W.,
    3. Keller J.
    2017 Long-term performance of enhanced-zero valent iron for drinking water treatment: a lab-scale study. Chemical Engineering Journal 315, 124–131.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Mjalli F. S.,
    2. Al-Asheh S.,
    3. Alfadala H. E.
    2007 Use of artificial neural network black-Box modeling for the prediction of wastewater treatment plants performance. Journal of Environmental Management 3 (83), 329–338.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Qiao J. F.,
    2. Li R. X.,
    3. Chai W.,
    4. Han H. G.
    2016 Prediction of BOD based on PSO-ESN neural network. Control Engineering of China 23 (4), 463–467.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Ren D. H.,
    2. Han H. G.,
    3. Qiao J. F.
    2014 Hierarchically neural network soft measurement modeling based on IHPSO algorithm for wastewater treatment process. Information and Control 43 (1), 123–128.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Singh P.,
    2. Kansal A.,
    3. Carliell-Marquet C.
    2016 Energy and carbon footprints of sewage treatment methods. Journal of Environmental Management 165, 22–30.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Struijs J.,
    2. Van de Meent D.,
    3. Schowanek D.,
    4. Buchholz H.,
    5. Patoux R.,
    6. Wolf T.,
    7. Austin T.,
    8. Tolls J.,
    9. Van Leeuwen K.,
    10. Galay-Burgos M.
    2016 Adapting simple treat for simulating behaviour of chemical substances during industrial sewage treatment. Chemosphere 159, 619–627.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Tang C.,
    2. Guan J. J.
    2017 Treatment technology on polymer flooding wastewater in Henan oilfield. Key Engineering Materials 719, 74–78.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Xu D. G.,
    2. Chen Y. W.,
    3. Chen X.,
    4. Xie Y. F.,
    5. Yang C. H.,
    6. Gui W. H.
    2016 Multi-model soft measurement method of the froth layer thickness based on visual features. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 154, 112–121.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Yang R.,
    2. Er P. V.,
    3. Wang Z. D.,
    4. Tan K. K.
    2016 An RBF neural network approach towards precision motion system with selective sensor fusion. Neurocomputing 199, 31–39.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Yoo K.,
    2. Shukla S. K.,
    3. Ahn J. J.,
    4. Oh K.,
    5. Park J.
    2016 Decision tree-based data mining and rule induction for identifying hydrogeological parameters that influence groundwater pollution sensitivity. Journal of Cleaner Production 122, 277–286.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Zhang Q. H.,
    2. Yang W. N.,
    3. Ngo H. H.,
    4. Guo W. S.,
    5. Jin P. K.,
    6. Dzakpasu M.,
    7. Yang S. J.,
    8. Wang Q.,
    9. Wang X. C.,
    10. Ao D.
    2016 Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China. Environment International 92–93, 11–22.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top

SELECTED ISSUE

Water Science and Technology: 77 (7)
  Volume 76, Issue 12

  Table of Contents
  Uncorrected Proofs
  Browse Archive

Actions

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Water Science & Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Research on a soft measurement model of sewage treatment based on a case-based reasoning approach
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Water Science & Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Water Science & Technology web site.
Share
Research on a soft measurement model of sewage treatment based on a case-based reasoning approach
Jiayan Zhang, Cuicui Du, Xugang Feng
Water Science and Technology Dec 2017, 76 (12) 3181-3189; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.417
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research on a soft measurement model of sewage treatment based on a case-based reasoning approach
Jiayan Zhang, Cuicui Du, Xugang Feng
Water Science and Technology Dec 2017, 76 (12) 3181-3189; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.417

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
View Full PDF
Download Powerpoint
Save to my folders
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Print
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • FACTOR ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURE DESIGN AFFECTING THE FORECASTING MODEL
    • CONSTRUCTION OF THE FORECASTING MODEL OF THE TOTAL WATER INFLOW BASED ON RBF
    • DESIGN OF FORECASTING MODEL FOR BOD BASED ON CBR
    • MODEL TRAINING AND VALIDATION BASED ON ACTUAL OPERATIONAL DATA
    • ENGINEERING APPLICATION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Sulfide production kinetics and model of stormwater retention ponds
  • Dynamic characterization of a FeCl3-dosed anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating municipal wastewater
  • Studies on desorption and regeneration of natural pumice for iron removal from aqueous solution
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

Case-Based Reasoning (CBR)
intelligent integrated prediction
sewage treatment
soft-sensing
  • Current Issue
  • Uncorrected Proofs
  • Browse Archive
  • Feedback
  • Online Submission
  • Subscribe
  • Contents Alerts
  • About the Journal
  • Open Access
  • Rights & Permissions

IWA Publishing
Alliance House
12, Caxton Street
London SW1H 0QS, UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7654 5500
Fax: +44 (0)20 7654 5555
Remove (0) if calling from outside the UK
iwapublishing.com
Company registered in England no. 3690822

© IWA Publishing | Cookies | Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Site Map | ISSN Print: 0273-1223 | ISSN Online: 1996-9732